[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 14:09:58 +0100 |
Pete French wrote:
> > Well, they are free to send patches that implement all this stuff. The
> > patches may or may not be accepted; if not, they can work on something
> > like PortabilityKit, or even fork.
>
> If I write an implementation of NSXMLParser will you refuse to include
> it in -base ? 'cos I am not going to bother starting if so...
>From what I've seen of its interface, and because I don't think that
anything XML belongs in -base, I would most likely argue against its
inclusion. However, the final call is Adam's, not mine.
- Alexander Malmberg
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- Re: XML idea, Fred Kiefer, 2004/01/08
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alexander Malmberg, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alexander Malmberg, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Nicola Pero, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Dennis Leeuw, 2004/01/08
- Re: XML idea, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/07
- Message not available
- Re: XML idea, Dr. Nikolaus Schaller, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06