[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: #import vs #include
From: |
Artem Baguinski |
Subject: |
Re: #import vs #include |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:40:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1i |
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
> A now broken version of the tutorial is online where the entire
> paragraph is removed.
cool ;)
in which for is it maintained? i have so many ideas as i read along that
i dont wanna bother you to add them all. if it was in CVS somewhere and
i had write permission - i could be contributing to community as i
read.
> Dennis
>
> Artem Baguinski wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:45:48PM +0000, Pete French wrote:
> >
> >>>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=stan+Shebs+warning+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss+group:gnu.gnustep.discuss&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&group=gnu.gnustep.discuss&selm=3BCA13EB.B815A6DD%40apple.com&rnum=1
> >>>from the current Apple ObjC maintainer .
> >>
> >>Thats way out of date! (did you look at the date on it ?)
> >>There was a CPP re-write that addressed someof the issues and #import
> >>is no longer depracated as far as I know.
> >
> >
> >that's interesting
> >
> >nevertheless the sentence in the tutorial i referred to in the original
> >mail is still incorrect and better be fixed. otherwise it will keep
> >people like me confused and believing in myths ;)
> >
>
--
gr{oe|ee}t{en|ings}
artm
- Re: #import vs #include, (continued)