Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control)

[Pete French]

> some new blood, if, as you put it, you really "don't much care which 
> way it goes." We need a leader. We need someone to give this project 

Oh for gods sake. the aim here is to write a piece of software, not wage
some dumb war.

> hereby question your ability to lead this project with that kind of 
> mentality.

...thats only based on the fact you have a skewed idea of what "the porjcet"
actually is.

The first aim of the prohect was to produce clone of the API. No more
and no less. Adam does a fine job at leading this effort.

If other people want to go off and have a second project to produce an OpenStep
enviornment on top of the core then they are quite free to do so - and you
could all quite happily elect some leader, form a roadmap of applications
to be written, allocate out the work and do an extremely good job.

...but instead you choose to come on here and whine about the fact that the
project isnt producing what you want it to do ? Do I detect a slight
allergy to actually doing some work here ?

I actually think a separte app writing project with a separate leader might be
an excellent thing. But comming on here demanding a change of leader is
ridiculous! I also think its very insulting to Adam (and the rest of the core
team) witjout whom you wouldnt have any sort of API kit on which to bas
any applications!

Now, please go off and try and do something constructive - preferably
by writing some bloody code - rather than offensive and arrogant emails.

-bat.