[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Environment? (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap)
From: |
Stefan Urbanek |
Subject: |
Environment? (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap) |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:01:01 +0200 |
Hi,
I would like to point out one fact...
On 2003-10-22 08:06:51 +0200 Philip Mötteli <Philip.Moetteli@tele2.ch> wrote:
> I dare adding my 2c… For me, Gnustep are first of all the libraries. Not a
> filemanager, nor a desktop, nor a system, nor development tools (apart of the
> libraries, obviously). So I personally regret a lot, that so much effort is
GNUstep is NOT just a set of libraries, it is an environment. I do not mean
desktop environment, but some kind of environment. Why? Because GNUstep:
- requires operating environment set up (shell variables, linker paths,...)
- uses it's own storage system (understand dedicated domain directories) that
is shared by all GNUstep tools(programs) and apps
- requires several daemons to be running (even for -base)
- ...
Those things make GNUstep something different and something more.
I would not call it development environment either... From all software around,
GNUstep can be compared to kind of Java environment (or as I have pointed out
in my previous posts: Emacs, Mozilla or OpenOffice).
Stefan Urbanek
--
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you
win.
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), (continued)
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), thisguyisi, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Björn Giesler, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Chad Hardin, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Dennis Leeuw, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Björn Giesler, 2003/10/22
- recruiting (was Re: GNUstep roadmap), Pete French, 2003/10/22
- Environment? (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap),
Stefan Urbanek <=
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re[2]: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Manuel Guesdon, 2003/10/23
- Re: Re[2]: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/23
- GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), David Ayers, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Helge Hess, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Helge Hess, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Helge Hess, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/28