|
From: | Banlu Kemiyatorn |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline |
Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 04:59:16 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030902 Thunderbird/0.2 |
David Ayers wrote:
Stan Shebs wrote:I don't find this a convincing argument to introduce more non portabilities. Yes the existing ones should be dealt with, but even more important is not to introduce any new ones. Let's deal with them before they hit the trunk. And the only way I can see us doing that, is if we break this patch down.I think we will want to solve it, but that can be done at leisure on the trunk, since it solves a problem that is presently hypothetical. Thereare other ObjC nonportabilities that are much more urgent to fix, such asthe libobjc use of internal GCC headers, which causes build problems regularly.Cheers, David
As a user, I agree with David and I think this improvements will only pollute the nicest part of the language itself. I'd like to ask any one who's reading this to share your opinions
that you really agree with this patch so you are quiet or not. Best regards.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |