[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful tha
From: |
Eric Christopherson |
Subject: |
Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ) |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:09:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:15:12PM -0700, Chris B. Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:44:13 +0200
> Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > The point is that GNUstep is an implementation of some standard, the
> > documents of which are copyrighted by another entity than the FSF. So
> > we cannot distribute them along with any GNUstep distribution.
> [...]
>
> I completely agree to all of your arguments, yet, that is no excuse that
> the documentation, that does come along with gnustep-core (and can be
> created via 'make doc=yes' -- which isn't really obvious, btw) doesn't
> contain much information.
About "make doc=yes"... I have been unable to find much about this in the
source or on the web. I got a few different answers on IRC, where a few
people seemed not to have heard of it and one implied that it might have
worked before, but maybe not now.
Also, I was wondering, if this is still used, when/where do I type it? For
instance, do you pass doc=yes only during the build phase, or during make
install? Does it work in any of the subdirectories of the core source, or
only in base (or elsewhere)?
Thanks in advance.
--
Furrfu! r a k k o at c h a r t e r dot n e t
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, (continued)
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, William F. Adams, 2003/06/13
- Message not available
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, MJ Ray, 2003/06/14
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ),
Eric Christopherson <=
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep lesssuccessful than GTK and Qt?? ), Adam Fedor, 2003/06/21
- Most elegant solution to Reader/Writer Problem with Objective-C?, Lachlan Deck, 2003/06/18
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/06/16