discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful tha


From: Eric Christopherson
Subject: Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? )
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:09:53 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:15:12PM -0700, Chris B. Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:44:13 +0200
> Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > The point is  that GNUstep is an implementation  of some standard, the
> > documents of which are copyrighted  by another entity than the FSF. So
> > we cannot distribute them along with any GNUstep distribution.
> [...]
> 
> I completely agree to all of your arguments, yet, that is no excuse that
> the documentation, that does come along with gnustep-core (and can be
> created via 'make doc=yes' -- which isn't really obvious, btw) doesn't
> contain much information.

About "make doc=yes"... I have been unable to find much about this in the
source or on the web. I got a few different answers on IRC, where a few
people seemed not to have heard of it and one implied that it might have
worked before, but maybe not now.

Also, I was wondering, if this is still used, when/where do I type it? For
instance, do you pass doc=yes only during the build phase, or during make
install? Does it work in any of the subdirectories of the core source, or
only in base (or elsewhere)?

Thanks in advance.

-- 
Furrfu!         r a k k o  at  c h a r t e r  dot  n e t




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]