discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Rendezvous


From: David Rogers
Subject: Re: Re: Rendezvous
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 13:45:53 -0500 (CDT)

Allright, i'm gonna get started on it tonight.  I've got some coffee, some 
documentation and a small lan.  I'll let the list know when i make some
progress or run into any roadblocks.

Dave

-------Original Message-------
From: Tobias <ibotty@web.de>
Sent: 06/09/03 03:35 PM
To: "Chris B. Vetter" <chrisv@web4inc.com>, David Rogers 
<davidrogers23@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Rendezvous

> 
> i was not sure, if i should step into this discussion, but now...

> > In order for NSNetServices to work, the mDNS responder needs to be
> > running on each machine, client and server.  

this is not neccessarily true, you can promote service running on host a
on 
host b and consume on host c.
only b and c needs to run the mDNS daemon.

> > Then the services are
> > registered with the daemon.  Apple has open sourced their Rendezvous
> > implementation with Linux makefiles and such.  What should be done
> > with the code for the mDNS daemon?

compiled ;) 
no kidding, be sure not to read the source to closely (*), maybe some of
us 
ends up writing another mdns daemon.

>
> The "open sourced Rendezvous" Apple offers you to download _only_
> includes a multicast DNS responder.
>
> If you want to implement NSNetServices and friends, you probably need a
> full Rendezvous compatible daemon, not just the mDNS responder.

but i guess it is worth it.
i am interested in doing it myself (allready thought about the how), but
do 
not have time atm.
(way too many interesting tasks..., way too less time...)

> Besides, since the above mentioned mDNS responder is licensed under the
> APSL, I doubt that it can be added to GNUstep directly.

it cannot. it is incompatible to the gpl.

but there are more free mdns implemementations.
see dotlocal.org for one (and the kame cvs for a better (but bsd-only
afaik)).

* and be not too appealed by the comments (see sco-linux discussion ;)

~ibotty
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]