[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: import vs include Re: Porting autogsdoc to OSX
From: |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
Subject: |
Re: import vs include Re: Porting autogsdoc to OSX |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:33:25 +0100 |
>> Exactly. Just as a side note, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf filed the request
>> for "safe-guarding" OS X Foundation/Cocoa Headers against multiple
>> #includes as an Apple Bug with radar ID #2868753. Today, just one day
>> later (!), the ticket has been closed.
>>
>> State: Verify
>> Resolution: Behaves Correctly
>
>You can always file the bug again if you disagree with them.
>
>I always thought that a company (Apple) quarrelling with his customers
>(Lars, you etc) - like in this case - is a very silly company.
>
>I frankly don't understand why they can't protect the headers against
>multiple #includes. That way, they would just make more users happy
(both
>the ones who want to use #import, and the ones who want to use #include),
>and they would loose nothing.
As I already told Marcus Müller, we should all file this bug
independently. Maybe we can make Apple listen this way (this way already
worked for others as I know from lurking on
darwin-development@lists.apple.com).
greetings, Lars
- Re: import vs include Re: Porting autogsdoc to OSX,
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <=