Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ?

[Pascal Bourguignon]

> From: Chris Hanson <cmh@mac.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:45:13 -0600
> 
> I don't see what the big problem with saving WYSIWYG positioning 
> information is.
>
> [...]
> 
>    -- Chris
> 
> PS - One of the big things that has held GNUstep back over the 4 
> years I've been following it is feature-creep.  Just an observation.

Of course, not all suggestions or propositions should be considered as
an  IMPERATIVE REQUEST  to implement  a  new feature.  Mostly, I  dare
express  myself in  those cases  just to  have it  on record  (for the
benefit of future generations of google users ;-)

-- 
__Pascal_Bourguignon__              (o_ Software patents are endangering
()  ASCII ribbon against html email //\ the computer industry all around
/\  and Microsoft attachments.      V_/ the world http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/
1962:DO20I=1.100  2001:my($f)=`fortune`;  http://petition.eurolinux.org/

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d? s++:++(+++)>++ a C+++  UB+++L++++$S+X++++>$ P- L+++ E++ W++
N++ o-- K- w------ O- M++$ V PS+E++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5? X+ R !tv b++(+)
DI+++ D++ G++ e+++ h+(++) r? y---? UF++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------