RE: libobjc

[Ben Lindsey]

Group,

  I am to understand that GCC 3 (or 3.0.1) is the preferred method for
libobjc above all others -- including the libobjc patch 1.0.1 provided at
the gnustep site?

  I ask this because I do believe I can get things running on GCC 3.0.1 --
but our initial port was with 2.95.3 plus the libobjc patch...

  If there is much to be gained in moving to 3.0.1 I'd like to know -- so I
can get a transistion underway...

  So, group?  What's the good word?  Should one stay or go to GCC 3.0.1 at
his/her earliest convienice in this situation?

  What issues does this (really -- or purportedly) resolve?

  Thanks in advance!  And kudos for a very helpful and invaluable list
community!!!!

-b



-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-gnustep-admin@gnu.org
[mailto:discuss-gnustep-admin@gnu.org]On Behalf Of Richard
Frith-Macdonald
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:42 AM
To: Dan Pascu
Cc: GNUstep
Subject: Re: libobjc



On Sunday, November 18, 2001, at 11:24 PM, Dan Pascu wrote:

>
> is the libobjc included in gcc-2.95.4 ok?
> the readme in libobjc under dev-apps in GNUstep says it fixes some
> things not present in gcc-2.95.2. what about 2.95.4?
>

Nope .... for a good libobjc you need to go to at least gcc-3.0


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep