discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sorry no attachment :-) (Fw: [Q] Why does this logic not work?)


From: Sungjin Chun
Subject: Re: Sorry no attachment :-) (Fw: [Q] Why does this logic not work?)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:28:44 +0900

Compare the file test.c with #if 0 and #if 1.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sungjin Chun" <ninja@linuxone.co.kr>
To: "Sungjin Chun" <ninja@linuxone.co.kr>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: Sorry no attachment :-) (Fw: [Q] Why does this logic not work?)


> Hi,
>
> I've found some clue :-) context->drawable is the
> source of the problem but I cannot figure out
> why... If I create drawable like the way in
> test.c( previously attached file ) it creates
> appicon but using RContextCreate, it does not
> create what I want.
>
> I don't know why T_T
>
> Bye.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sungjin Chun" <ninja@linuxone.co.kr>
> To: <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 10:04 PM
> Subject: Sorry no attachment :-) (Fw: [Q] Why does this logic not work?)
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sungjin Chun" <ninja@linuxone.co.kr>
> > To: <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 10:03 PM
> > Subject: [Q] Why does this logic not work?
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've tested appicon making code in barflib and
> > > tested more simple code like attached file( to make,
> > > cc -o test test.c -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 ). This
> > > simple test program works. It simply create appicon
> > > window. But modifying( actually copying DPSwindow
> > > code and rename it as DPSiconwindow and make
> > > NSIconWindow's _initBackendWindow to use
> > > DPSiconwindow function or method. ) xgps backend
> > > using this logic does not work, actually almost no
> > > difference. In test program the size is exactly 64x64
> > > and no border and it receives arrange icon message
> > > from WindowMaker but GNUstep's appicon has border
> > > so, 65x65 is the size and does not receive arrange icon
> > > message and overlaps existing appicon and mini icon.
> > > Why?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> >
>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]