Re: Idea

[vinny]

>From what I have been seeing, does it really pay to rwerite WM ?. However
much it tries to emulate *step,
I think it should be allowed to evolve in its own way , atleast till core
1.0 is released and distros like RedHat
and Debian package GNUstep as part of their distro and not as a power tool.
But yes, I think tighter integration
between step and wm is needed and can be achieved.

Greetings

vinny
----- Original Message -----
From: <ian.mondragon@bankofamerica.com>
To: <vinny@mailandnews.com>; <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: Idea


> vinodh -
>
> please also note that while cooperative, the GNUstep and WindowMaker
> projects are separate entities (unfortunately).  i am sure that many
others
> out there have considered, as i have, rewriting WM to use GNUstep instead
of
> the WINGs library...which simply wants to be GNUstep anyways <grin>.
> perhaps we could get this, too, rolling in some way/shape/form?  i've been
> fiddling around with the wm source for about 2 months scheming and kniving
> about how to go through with it...plus i've got so much on my platter
> already...
>
> what does everyone think?
>
> @end
>
> -ian