discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running gr-ieee 802.11 and gr-ieee 802.15.4 under


From: Bastian Bloessl
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running gr-ieee 802.11 and gr-ieee 802.15.4 under same flowgraph (interference and co-existence)
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:52:42 +0100

Hi,

thanks for the detailed description. I’m not sure what the actual error is. 
What do you mean with grc turns dark.
Does it crash or stop receiving or actually show a black window? Did grc turn 
dark or the flow graph?

Best,
Bastian



> On 4. Jul 2017, at 22:10, sumitstop <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hello, 
> (Its a long post :) as I want to give as much details as possible)
> 
> Today I did a strange experiment. Under GNU Radio companion, I created a
> blank project. Then I copy pasted the wifi_loopback.grc from gr-ieee 802.11
> to my blank project and made it run. Off course I took care of the initial
> settings of the variables and all. It ran successfully. Then I copy pasted
> the transceiver_OQPSK.grc from gr-ieee 802.15.4 to the same grc project
> where wifi_loopback.grc was there. Then I separated the variables carefully
> and make both wifi_loopback and transceiver_OQPSK to run under the same flow
> graph at the same time. They ran successfully without any issue! 
> 
> In the next step, I tried to create an environment of interference between
> WiFi and ZigBee by adding the baseband output of WiFi transmitter and ZigBee
> transmitter. But before that I upsampled the ZigBee 5 times to make it 20
> MHz wide. 
> 
> In the next step, I took the output of mixed signal i.e. ZigBee + WiFi and
> fed it to individual receivers. Here also I downsampled the mixed signal to
> 4 MHz before feeding it to the ZigBee receiver. 
> 
> But this setup din't work at all. The grc just turned dark. There were no
> error messages. I am not sure where I am theoretically and/or practically
> wrong. 
> 
> * I am trying to analyse WiFi and ZigBee interference. 
> 
> Regards




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]