discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Pybombs 2.0 woes


From: Martin Braun
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Pybombs 2.0 woes
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 10:36:52 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

Can someone please summarize this problem? I'm afraid I'm not getting
the full picture here.

Cheers,
M

On 03/05/2016 11:11 AM, Dan CaJacob wrote:
> I had the same pip error.  It seemed to be related to a conflicting
> version of requests.  I am running Ubuntu 15.10  to fix the problem, I
> uninstalled my pip-installed pybombs and apt-installed python-pip.  I
> then installed pip and requests via easy_install (generally don't go
> this route, but it worked).  Then I was able to install pybombs via pip
> again and this time build was completely successful.
> 
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:54 PM West, Nathan <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> 
>     On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Marcus Müller
>     <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> 
>         Hi Mike,
> 
> 
>>         Following advice here I descended down a rabbit hole and tried
>>         to start again “pip uninstall pybombs”. Pip was not found.
>>
>         Uninstalling pybombs via pip only makes sense if you've
>         installed it via pip ("pip install pybombs"). Seemingly, you've
>         either gotten PyBombs through different means, so investigating
>         pip doesn't really make sense, or something uninstalled pip
>         after you've installed it, and installed Pybombs with it. That
>         would be strange.
> 
> 
>     I don't think that's true. It's unintuitive, but pip is the
>     generally accepted way to uninstall anything installed through
>     setup.py. See
>     http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1550226/python-setup-py-uninstall
>      
> 
>>         That has fixed the pip problem but not the UHD installation
>>         crash, but as a by product the error messages have become more
>>         verbose – and guess what? The problem is an undeclared type.
>>         *_THIS SAME ISSUE WITH UNDEFINED TYPES_* (shout so it sinks
>>         in, then repeat because it didn’t) *_THIS SAME ISSUE WITH
>>         UNDEFINED TYPES_*  that has been around for over a YEAR in UHD
>>         and in this case rx_dsp_core_200.cpp.
>>
>         There is no such issue I know of. Now, that doesn't mean there's
>         no issue, it just means that none of the other users I've talked
>         to nor myself encountered it. However, probabilistically
>         speaking, that's indicative of something being wrong with your
>         system...
> 
>>         Every so often I point it out and someone fixes it and later
>>         on someone else (I wonder if this is the same person who broke
>>         it last time) then adds some new code somewhere else
>>         recreating the same errors. In this case its uintptr_t that is
>>         not declared.
>>
>         Um, sorry, I don't even see uintptr_t in rx_dsp_core_200.cpp,
>         and I've searched through its file history: It never occurred
>         there. So to research this issue, I'll need your full "make"
>         output. Maybe your version of Ubuntu fell off the testing
>         bandwagon: which version of Ubuntu are you using?
>>
>>         A good motto is to assume nothing and please make sure you
>>         declare everything.____
>>
>         uintptr_t is a standard type. See "man stdint.h".
> 
> 
>     Looks potentially familiar... Two things might be going on. 1) If
>     you have a UHD installed and the current build picks up on it things
>     might get messy in non-intuitive ways. Make sure you remove any
>     stray UHD installations. That seems likely in this case. 2) There's
>     a similar issue with some versions of glibc and boost. See
>     https://github.com/gnuradio/gr-recipes/pull/4#issuecomment-181188909
>     (seems unlikely in this case). BTW, if you see a problem in the code
>     that keeps coming back you don't have to wonder who does it... you
>     can use git to know. Anyway, indeed without errors/build logs I'm
>     not sure what you expect anyone to do here.
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 
> -- 
> Very Respectfully,
> 
> Dan CaJacob
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]