Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FOSDEM attendee? Re: 802.15.4 CSS PHY

[Bastian Bloessl]

Hi Christopher,

in your talk you mentioned some bugs that you found. Would be great if 
you could create some patches and a make pull request.

If someone is interested in the 800 MHz phy I will look for cheap HW and 
try to implement them.

Best,
Bastian

On 2015-02-02 15:39, Felix W. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that was me ;). I also talked to Bastian Bloessl and we agreed that I
> will create a pull request to gr-ieee802-15-4 once I finish my master's
> thesis and have it all cleaned up. In the meantime, you can find my fork
> of Bastian's repo here: https://github.com/fewu/gr-ieee802-15-4. The
> branch with my work is called css_phy. Currently I'm working on the
> synchronization for the CSS PHY. My previous work focused on evaluating
> PHY and MAC performance with the assumption of perfect sync. It's also
> not really complete yet (e.g. preamble and PHR are dropped in the
> receiver because their content is assumed to be known) and endianness
> might be wrong at some points. But I will try to fix that in the next weeks.
>
> Feel free to contact me if you have any questions!
>
> Greetings
>
> Felix
>
> 2015-02-02 7:52 GMT+01:00 Christopher Friedt <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>:
>
>     Hi list,
>
>     this is just a shot in the dark, but I forgot to get the name of an
>     attendee during the Internet of #allthethings talk.
>
>     If you are, or know who is, the person who said he had implemented an
>     802.15.4 CSS PHY in the question period, please get in touch with me
>     or pass on the message.
>
>     It would be very beneficial to collect the 15.4 related work into one
>     repository to reuse some amount of code. The 800 & 900 MHz PHY would
>     be very useful to have in there and would be relatively painless to
>     design. The CSS PHY is obviously much more interesting :-)
>
>     Also, in particular, any future UWB PHY designers would be helpful.
>     The SDR hardware for such a PHY might be a bit pricey. Even a
>     unit-test driven PHY design would be helpful or simulation.
>
>     As of this point, I have not heard of any major silicon vendors are
>     even speaking about offering an UWB PHY, so it would be nice to be
>     ahead of the game.
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     C
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

--
Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
Distributed Embedded Systems
University of Paderborn, Germany
http://www.ccs-labs.org/~bloessl/