discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FunCube Dongle pro +


From: Volker Schroer
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FunCube Dongle pro +
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 11:00:05 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

udev_enumerate_new is called from  the  latest hidapi code.

Some distros provide a hidapi package. So the actual fcdproplus tries to detect if an hidapi package is installed. Otherwise it uses the hidapi code provided with fcdproplus, which uses udev_enumerate_new.

So it would be interesting waht cmake has reported.

Near the end of the cmake output you see something like this ( in the case that the hidapi package is installed):

GNURADIO_PMT_FOUND = TRUE
-- checking for module 'alsa'
--   found alsa, version 1.0.28
-- Found ALSA 1.0.28
-- checking for module 'libusb-1.0'
--   found libusb-1.0, version 1.0.19
-- Found libusb-1.0: /usr/include/libusb-1.0, /usr/lib64/libusb-1.0.so
-- Found Doxygen: /usr/bin/doxygen (found version "1.8.5")
-- System Hidapi Lib /usr/lib64/libhidapi-libusb.so is used
-- Audio LIBS: /usr/local/gnuradio-orig/lib/libgnuradio-audio.so

As Marcus already proposed, it might be helpfull to see the output of

ldd lib/libgnuradio-fcdproplus.so

inside the build directory

and additionally from the gnuradio install directory.

I think udev_enumerate_new is provided from newer versions of libudev.

If you want to use a hidapi version without udev_enumerate_new
just checkout the with_hidapi release.

-- Volker




Am 01.11.2014 um 01:39 schrieb Marcus Müller:
Tracing this down; Daniel, could you share what
pkg-config --static --libs libsub-1.0
says?
in your build directory, can you do a
ldd lib/libgnuradio-fcdproplus.so


Greetings, and good night (forgot the time)
Marcus

On 11/01/2014 01:04 AM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Oh indeed, good point!
Sylvain: you're right.
How gr-fcdproplus ends up being able to compile and link is still a
mystery to me. I was expecting a horrible "symbol export forwarding
hack" involving libusb, but no:

$>nm -D /lib64/libusb-1.so
                 U udev_device_get_action
                 U udev_device_get_devnode
                 U udev_device_get_sysname
                 U udev_device_new_from_syspath
                 U udev_device_unref
                 U udev_enumerate_add_match_subsystem
                 U udev_enumerate_get_list_entry
                 U udev_enumerate_new
...



gives me all of the udev symbols as undefined, which obviously is
correct, because they should be dynamically loaded from libusb:
$>ldd /lib64/libusb-1.0.so

libusb-1.0.so|grep udev
    linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff6b7fc000)
    libudev.so.1 (0x00000038b6600000)
...

Trying to build this now, but I'm currently on a machine where I
haven't even installed GR yet :/ this might take a second.

Greetings,
Marcus


On 11/01/2014 12:43 AM, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
What I find strange is that the symbol error is found at runtime and
not at link-time. That suggest either there is two libudev and the one
used for runtime is different than the one found for link-time, or
that this library was copied over from another system.

Cheers,

    Sylvain


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]