discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ofdm channel estimation


From: Marcus Müller
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ofdm channel estimation
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:48:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Xianda,

how should we possibly tell? You expect us to be able to guess what is
going wrong with your measurement, in an environment that is unknown
to us, using a receiving antenna, modified flowgraph and tx signal
that you did not really define.

As Martin said, if a detector outputs a 1, it might be a false alarm,
also known as bad luck.

With stochastic problems, you always have to make a trade off between
false alarm rate and type II errors. This is called receiver operating
characteristic. With most detectors, you can adjust their parameters
to accommodate your false alarm rate/detection rate needs.

Greetings,
Marcus



On 15.07.2014 12:56, xianda wrote:
> Oh,I guess that because i receive signal which at the frequency of
> 2.45e9.It is like the wifi.May be I receive the wifi signal?Am i
> right? Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2014-07-15 05:17:35, "Martin Braun" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>> On 07/15/2014 09:39 AM, xianda wrote:
>>> Hi Martin: Thank you for your kindly reply. Another question I
>>> want to ask. When I use the rx_ofdm,I add a UHD:USRP 
>>> Source.(Environment: USRP N210)I know when the block Schmidl
>>> &Cox OFDM synch. detect the signal,the port "detect" will
>>> output 1.And I test it.I use the rx_ofdm when I don't use the
>>> tx_ofdm.It means that no signal exist.But I find 1 in the port
>>> "detect".Why?When no signal exist,it should output 0.Why I see
>>> 1 from it?
>> 
>> ...bad luck? It's not impossible to generate false alarms. What
>> did you feed the block?
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Thank you so much. Best regards, xd
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> At 2014-07-14 04:37:37, "Martin Braun" <address@hidden>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 07/13/2014 01:06 PM, xianda wrote: >> Hi all: >> Have you
>>>> ever using
>>> the >> gnuradio/gr-digital/examples/ofdm/rx_ofdm.grc?And I
>>> change the >> rx_ofdm.py as follows: >> 
>>> self.connect((self.digital_ofdm_chanest_vcvc_0, 1), >> 
>>> blocks.file_sink(gr.sizeof_gr_complex * fft_len, 
>>> 'channel-estimate.dat')) >> And i use the matlab: > >Please
>>> read the fine manual:
>>>> http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1digital_1_1ofdm__chanest__vcvc.html#details.
>>>>>
>>>> 
The channel estimate is on a tag. > >M >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >Discuss-gnuradio
>>> mailing list >address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradi
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>> mailing list address@hidden 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>> mailing list address@hidden 
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTxSMPAAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtRwEH+gPol6VhuE5BBqyq5GUD7H9P
GhTufylcZhwuK5XLbZg1l5ZrcqrcJu8+CZRFmWuK2vIml4JhzVPre5gPSbYeRdFs
e+aZ+mT3TN62oXXurvq+YM6mnBdewR2bi8h/DtkC77OkB5SvL6j6rREWSg73flCB
/sh2hgHuQkJ8d2sh8ut0L1NF6rlbB3l+unwEgjGeLnDyH3fdFjfUDPlh7OiX318w
GmfPasCiSMMmcSqXCIaXcHaaVF/cdip7Yd8LQACMKJvZBT9AvGh5i725z3Drytdl
20B69ymrWD93bEdBjN7WAyAAvDJVbE6nWv1gXuUYfkbnGHwIaGomXfU8PQrPY14=
=qRmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]