discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How many multiple/simultaneous PLLs can I have ru


From: LD Zhang
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How many multiple/simultaneous PLLs can I have running on USRP2?
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 16:33:56 -0700

Sorry for the confusion. I have been using USRP in a rather micky-mouse way. For the longest time, I was just capturing data on host computer disk and do brute force processing in MATLAB. It’s time for me to think about speed up. And the first thing is to consider the USRP processing capability. The PLL may still be the right solution if the PLL faithfully replicates the original signal, which I think it should. But having the gnu-radio doing the PLL, I am not sure there is much of a speed gain. Maybe there are intelligent ways of organizing this so that it can be sped up? Maybe the Gnuradio is faster than Matlab. But these days the matlab has been awful fast, not much slower than C. Still my matlab is not organized as nicely as the gnuradio. Right now I don’t have any streamlined processing. The suggestion on using the PFB filterbanks and PLLs in parallel and streaming operation may have significant speed up? Your opinion is appreciated.

 

LD

 

From: Marcus D. Leech [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:03 PM
To: LD Zhang; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How many multiple/simultaneous PLLs can I have running on USRP2?

 

Or am I wrong that the resource is in the computer and not in the USRP?

 

LD

 

It's all in the computer, unless you do an FPGA-based implementation.   Gnu Radio blocks run on the host machine, not the USRP hardware.

I admit to being a little bit surprised that you don't know that already, given how long you've been posting things to this list,
  and using USRP hardware.




-- 
Marcus Leech
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]