discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] MTU Size


From: Alexander Olihovik
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] MTU Size
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:50:59 -0400

Josh was correct; it was the network. Specifically, the network switch wasn't configured to save its settings after a reboot... Thank you both for the help!

-Alex

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:

On 23 Jul 2012 13:05, Josh Blum wrote:

On 07/23/2012 09:40 AM, Alexander Olihovik wrote:
More specifically, I've tried changing the device address with: device_addr="addr0=10.1.1.105, recv_frame_size=4096, send_frame_size=4096" but when running the program, both the recv_frame_size and send_frame_size are still 1472 bytes. I've also configured my network to be able to handle frames of size 4096, and have had this working with C++ code. However, the Python code doesn't work as I would expect. It seems not to make a difference whether I specify the frame size or not.
Its the same device args, so python/c++ it shouldnt make a difference.

The driver is however testing if it can handle that MTU by sending test
packets. Perhaps its still a network configuration issue?

Also, you should be able to

uhd_usrp_probe --args="addr0=10.1.1.105, recv_frame_size=4096,
send_frame_size=4096"

and still see the same issue.

-josh

Lots of network cards don't handle jumbograms, even if you configure them to do so.

 

 

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio




--
Alex Olihovik
University of Virginia 2013
BS Electrical Engineering
BS Computer Engineering
address@hidden


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]