discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about OpenBTS


From: hOWARD wONG
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Question about OpenBTS
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 02:17:53 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

On 6/5/2012 10:01 PM, Pan, Luyuan wrote:
On 2012/6/4 23:28, Thomas Tsou wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Pan, Luyuan<address@hidden>  wrote:
Hello,
I want to set up the OpenBTS, and I want to know which board is better,
USRP1 or USRP2? Or any other suggestion? Thank you.
Both USRP1 and USRP2 work with OpenBTS and neither can be considered
"better" without describing your requirements. USRP2 / N2xx will
support higher bandwidths with the GigE interface if that is important
to you. USRP1 (or B100) will be cheaper. For stable clocking, the
USRP1 requires hardware modification to support an external 52MHz
clock signal. Other devices can use a more accessible internal or
external 10 MHz reference source.

Also, OpenBTS is not gnuradio, and the openbts-discuss or usrp-users
lists may be better sources for that type of information.

http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

   Thomas
Sorry, This may not the proper place to ask question about OpenBTS, But I just want to ask one more questions. My scenario is : I want to set up a BTS, scan the user nearby and get their IMSI, then attract them to my fake BTS and broadcast them a message. 1. I want to use USRP1 to do the project, Is it enough? (I have both of USRP1 and USRP2 at hand) 2. Is it that SMS-CB a better choice for me? (my ultimate goal is to broadcast some messages)
Thank you for your help!

Is it legal to do that?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]