[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How can we make GNU Radio better?
From: |
Martin Braun |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How can we make GNU Radio better? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2011 10:21:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:23:21PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> Rather than flog the topic of what is wrong with GNU Radio, I'd
> prefer to emphasize that it is only as good as we make it. So how
> can we make it better. Here are some of my thoughts:
>
> 1) Expand the pool of people contributing code.
>
> 2) Improve the grc help files and parameter descriptions.
>
> 3) Divide the code base in to true core functions, signal processing
> libraries, and applications.
3a) Remove inconsistencies which have popped up due to the organic
'growth' of GNU Radio over the last years.
> 4) Use cmake instead of autotools. (Not my first choice, but may
> help the windows people)
5) Improve the development interface. When you're developing stuff with
GNU Radio, you'll probably be using a lot of existing blocks and adding
a few of your own. This process is still quite clumsy in my opinion and
would be easier if
- there were better DSP debugging tools (e.g. nicer graphical sinks you
can simply connect your blocks -- I'd say that anytime I need to pipe
the output from a block into a file_sink and then analyse it with
Matlab, that's when the development interface is lacking),
- GRC could be tied into the development chain (e.g. inspect hier_blocks
by double-clicking them, inspect output of individual sub-blocks)
MB
--
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Communications Engineering Lab (CEL)
Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun
Research Associate
Kaiserstraße 12
Building 05.01
76131 Karlsruhe
Phone: +49 721 608-43790
Fax: +49 721 608-46071
www.cel.kit.edu
KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and
National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
pgplY2COKhWww.pgp
Description: PGP signature