discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] High pass frequency response with LFRX boards


From: Drew Read
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] High pass frequency response with LFRX boards
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:22:50 +1300

Yes! that seems to be doing it.
After using u.set_dc_offset_cl_enable(0x0, 0xf) to disable the dc
correction the Low Freq roll-off seems to be gone and my IQ looks a
lot better.
That's really excelent, I presume I'll still need to compensate for
the dc in my flow graph now though...

Many thanks!
Drew

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Marcus D. Leech <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 07:47 PM, Eric Brombaugh wrote:
>>
>> You're probably seeing the high-pass behavior of the RX DC offset
>> removal. There's a logical block inside the FPGA which integrates the
>> ADC DC offset and subtracts it from the incoming signal.
>>
>> This function isn't needed on the TX side.
>>
>>
> Would it have such a high corner-frequency, though? Seems like the DC
> estimate integrator function
>  could easily be arranged to have a corner frequency much lower than
> 1KHz.  But maybe I'm
>  wrong.
>
>
>
> --
> Principal Investigator
> Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
> http://www.sbrac.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>



-- 
Andrew Read +64 (03) 357 0787
Test Analyst
Design Verification and Validation Team
Tait Electronics Ltd
=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]