discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gnuradio land speed record?


From: Per Zetterberg
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gnuradio land speed record?
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:51:36 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)

Clark Pope wrote:

----------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:01:41 -0700
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gnuradio land speed record?

On 07/30/2010 09:33 AM, Clark Pope wrote:
I'm curious what people do with the wideband capability of the
gnuradio/usrp and what is the widest bandwidth signal one can really
process with available computers?

For reference I have a ~2.4 GHz core 2 duo laptop. For a 200 kHz FM
demodulator I consume about 40% of one cpu. That's pretty much the
simplest useful thing anyone can do so that maps to my laptop might
be able to process 1 MHz bandwidth continuously.

Similarly, my hard drive can't really keep up with 32 Mbyte/s
recording. So if samples are 16-bit and you really can't afford lost
data it seems like recording is limited to maybe 10 MHz or so
bandwidth.

However, with gigabit Ethernet you can send 100 Mbyte/s or more.
What's the most anyone has recorded or processed continuously? What
level of compexity was the processing?
With RAID arrays or SSDs, it isn't that hard anymore to sustain 100 MB/s
recording to disk. With 4 and 6 core systems and the i7 architecture
you can get more than 5X the performance of your laptop.

There are a lot of applications using the full 25 MHz of RF bandwidth.
You just need to pay a lot of attention to efficiency of your program
and algorithms.

Matt
Good point, if you remove the CPU bottleneck and go straight to storage you can do 100 MByte/s. Now is gigE the best for that or would SATA be better? Seems like once you buy the networking and storage equipment you've blown your budget relative to the usrp price. Yeah, I'd be interested in what those 25 MHz apps are. Maybe we need a contest for widest bandwidth, practical, most useful application on gnuradio. One ground rule though would be that the cost of the processing device has to be less than the USRP2, for example. Thanks, Clark _______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

I use the 25MHz sample-rate to test algorithms. In one application I transmit during 0.1ms and then use 10ms to process the data. This is for doing research on algorithms. It's still different from pure off-line processing as I can do feedback, MAC-algorithms and so on.

I would actually like to have more than 25MHz maybe 100MHz to be able to work with bandwidths such as 40MHz.

BR/
Per



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]