|
From: | Josh Blum |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GRC: gee it sure would be nice if... |
Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:05:38 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Shredder/3.0.3pre |
With the current framework, I usually suggest encapsulating logic into python modules or hier2_blocks, that grc will call into. Post processing the output is a bad idea.
Id love to see multi-line editable parameters. And to go with that a function block of some sort. Howabout a block that imports arbitrary python code from a file and writes it into the generated code? Although thats only one step away from the above mentioned method.
Thanks, -Josh On 04/26/2010 05:47 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
There was a tidy way to insert *code* at certain formalized points in the flow-graph setup, without having to post-process the output of GRC. For example, I want to setup a timeout function, that goes off once in a while, to "do stuff". But that's just an example. We already have "variables" and "import" which have special semantics, in terms of where they get placed in the layout of the generated code. Any thoughts been given to that?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |