[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value
From: |
Ulrika Uppman |
Subject: |
RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:47:30 +0100 |
Hi,
I have now tried both the git master and the vrt branch and the results there
are similar to those in the 3.2 version.
I was guessing that the timestamps would be generated/handled differently in
the vrt branch but at a first glance I didn't see any major differences in the
code. What is the difference with regard to timestamps and timing when using
the vrt branch?
Regards,
/Ulrika
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per Zetterberg [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:16 PM
> To: Ulrika Uppman
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value
>
> >>
> >> Do anyone know why the difference in timestamp value
> between received
> >> packets is so big? What am I missing here?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> /Ulrika
>
> Have you tried the vrt branch by jblum ?
>
> BR/
> Per
>
>
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/18
- [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Per Zetterberg, 2010/02/18
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value,
Ulrika Uppman <=
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Josh Blum, 2010/02/19
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/22
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/23
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Per Zetterberg, 2010/02/23
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Josh Blum, 2010/02/23
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] RE: Timestamp value, Ulrika Uppman, 2010/02/25
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Timestamp value, Tim Pearce, 2010/02/18