discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Timesample/Ethernet Fifos


From: Tim Pearce
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Timesample/Ethernet Fifos
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:21:10 +0000

Hi Doug,

Yes for each sample its calculating the new sample value by adding the decimation rate.

I'll try this without the addition as it might reduce the processor load and can easily be post processed for the application I'm working on.

Cheers,

Tim

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Doug Geiger <address@hidden> wrote:
Tim Pearce wrote:
Hi All,

I've modified the source to generate timesamples (as a seperate stream) from the USRP2 source blocks and noticed an issue - if the PC is struggling some frames have a timesample dated before the timesample of a frame processed before it.

It's possible I've done something wrong modifying the code but I think this is a host issue as the problem is reduced (i.e it only happens at lower decimation rates) on faster machines.

Has this been seen before? Are there any kernel options etc that might improve this? I'd assumed the ethernet bit was a FIFO buffer of some sort but guess this isnt working quite right.

Tested on Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty).

Cheers,

Tim

Tim,
You're taking the source and outputting a timestamp for each sample? Are you taking the timestamp for the frame, and then just incrementing according to decimation, until you get to a new frame then?
I haven't noticed such peculiarities when I look at my timestamps - but thus far I'm mainly looking just at the frame-by-frame timestamp.
Doug

--
Douglas Geiger
Code 5545
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
Washington, DC 20375
(202) 767-9048
address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]