Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] grc should warn, not fail with malformed xml

[Ed Criscuolo]

Josh Blum wrote:
> It was intentional. If the block definition is bad, it prints out the 
> problem and exits. The other possibility is to print the error, not 
> parse that block which contained the error, and continue loading.
>
> My worry was that if somebody (including myself) makes a bad block, the 
> error would be missed or overlooked when the program opens, so rather, 
> it just exits with error.
>
> Any strong opinions on this (error vs warn)? Either way is ok with me, I 
> just want it to be most useful for the majority of users.


Why not have it both ways? :)  I suggest a preferences option to specify
the behavior.  That way you make it most useful to ALL the users!

@(^.^)@  Ed