discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] anyone implement the Raleigh fading model/multi-


From: Richard Clarke
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] anyone implement the Raleigh fading model/multi-path?
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:16:30 +1300
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Hi George,

I have had a Summer student doing some work on this (a year ago now). He implemented a GNU Radio module that can do Rayleigh channel simulation. He based it on a particular paper (I'd have to look it up) for the implementation. He verified the statistical performance of his implementation against the Matlab Rayleigh channel model and against theory and found it to be a close match. I'm not entirely convinced of the delayed multiple path aspects of the design/implementation but haven't had time to look into it further. In fact as it stands I believe the GNU Radio module (at C++ level) only handles a single flat fading path and doing multiple delayed paths is done at the python module level and which invokes multiple instances of the Flat fading Rayleigh C++ GNU Radio module.

I'd welcome another set of eyes and someone more experienced than I am with GNU Radio to help finish off this potentially very useful addition to the GNU Radio code base.

Cheers
Richard



_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]