Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] updated packet format on USRP inband signaling

[Eric Blossom]

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 08:33:23PM -0500, Brian Padalino wrote:
> >Would you prefer that both types of data occurred in the same packet?
> >
> >Eric
> 
> Not at all - it makes much more sense to calculate when to bring up /
> tear down the RF stuff on the host rather than inside the FPGA and
> back calculate.
> 
> Is the timestamp details of the operations just going to happen one
> after the other?

That was the plan.

> It might be beneficial to bandwidth to have a NOP
> command with the argument being number of ticks - that way you don't
> have to send 2 512-byte packets when you want things to occur slightly
> offset in time.

That sounds good.  Would you interpret it as a delta-t from the
timestamp in the header?  I'm thinking about the case where there are
multiple DELAY ops in the payload.

Eric