[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:37:04 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 02:21:55AM -0500, Satashu Goel wrote:
> I am trying to find some information on how to use the two Tx
> daughterboards to transmit independent data streams?
> In one of the posts,
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-10/msg00142.html
> Eric said that this can be done by using a "stream with two interleaved
> channels of I & Q data".
> Does anyone know how to do this using the existing blocks? It will be
> great if someone can post an example.
>
> Thanks,
> Satashu
Do you still need the example?
Eric
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Satashu Goel, 2006/03/05
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards,
Eric Blossom <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Satashu Goel, 2006/03/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Angilberto Muniz Sb, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards - I've got it !, Angilberto Muniz Sb, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards - I've got it !, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards - I've got it !, Angilberto Muniz Sb, 2006/03/12
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards - I've got it !, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/13
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Simulateous transmission from two daughterboards, Eric Blossom, 2006/03/11