discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss-gnuradio] Cognitive Radio on agenda for FCC's meeting in March


From: John Gilmore
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Cognitive Radio on agenda for FCC's meeting in March
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:58:15 -0800

This msg is about "Cognitive" radios, not just software-defined
radios.  Cognitive radios make major adjustments in their transmission
and reception behavior, based on observing the local radio environment.

Cornell makes some good points.  There are small areas of the spectrum
where NOBODY can transmit, so that passive receivers such as
radiotelescopes can receive.

I've been advocating for defining a simple scheme for "posting"
frequency bands with machine-readable signs (like the "No Hunting"
signs found on trees and fences).  It would have to be simple enough
that every cognitive radio transmitter could implement it, listening
to learn the rules of the neighborhood before transmitting.  The radio
astronomers could "fence off" their frequencies and physical locations
by occasionally transmitting these "No Trespassing" signs on a nearby
coordinating frequency.  Anyone interested?

        John

Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:03:02 -0800
From: Seth David Schoen <address@hidden>
To: John Gilmore <address@hidden>

John Gilmore writes:
> [Have we talked recently to folks at FCC about this?  Let's check in and
>  see what we can learn.  ...

This is presumably going to be a rule in ET Docket 03-108.

There's some continuing ex parte activity there.

Here's a reply comment critical of us and PK from the radio
astronomers at Cornell.

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6516210510

-- 
Seth Schoen
Staff Technologist                                address@hidden
Electronic Frontier Foundation                    http://www.eff.org/
454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA  94110     1 415 436 9333 x107




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]