Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Change request - VrSigProc.h

[Rob Judd]

Krzysztof,

I have them. I've used them. I've beaten them to death on every kind of
C code imaginable. I've also done the same with Borland 3.1, Borland
5.5, msvc 4, rsxnt, lcc-win32, djgpp and god only knows what else.

I even built my own console compiler from lcc-4.1 and if you check the
Priceton repository I think my code is still in there.

So, when you ask me a loaded question like this, what am I to say?

;-)

Rob


Krzysztof Kamieniecki wrote:
> 
> Can I ask why are you using MSVC instead of MINGW and/or CYGWIN.
> 
> Quoting Rob Judd <address@hidden>:
> 
> > static const int MARK_ALREADY = 2;      //!< all data is already
> > computed
> >   static const int MARK_READY = 1;              //!< data is ready to be
> > computed (and has been
> >
> > marked)
> >   static const int MARK_READY_NO_MARK = 0;//!< data is ready on this
> > level or above,
> >                                         //   but no further data should be 
> > marked
> >   static const int MARK_NO_READY = -1;          //!< no data is ready to be
> > computed
> >   static const int MARK_THREAD = -2;            //!< data is marked by 
> > another
> > thread
> >   static const int MARK_continue = -3;    //!< flag distinct from all
> > others (keep last)
> >
> >
> > Pure specifiers should be inside a function, and MSVC won't accept it
> > even if GNUC does. I'll leave the recoding to the experts. ;-)
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio