[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why not F/V and V/F Convertors ?!
From: |
Saeed Beyty |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Why not F/V and V/F Convertors ?! |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 04:45:29 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi
even if we consider a F->V converter as a Signal Fourier Transform Extracter ( SFTE may be ! ) then the least apportunity is to write the IFFT ( Inverse Fast Fourier Transform) instead of the commonly used FFT, but with the bonus of slower A/D conveters ( cheaper ofcourse ! )
However i'm going to prepare solutions for different methods of comm. modulation types without use of IFFT.
also here is a missunderstanding :
Dear Hermann Gausterer replyed my later mail includeing this phrase ;
"but with this type of operation you can be sure, that
every new "narrow" band type of modulations is only
a software update away from working"
what did mean hermann ? please tell me your meaning clearly :-) .
thanks for your considirations.
-- Saeed
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.