[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Parallel Port Interface
From: |
Ettus, Matt |
Subject: |
RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Parallel Port Interface |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:03:56 -0800 |
> Do 96ksample/s cards have 48kHz of actual bandwidth or will
> some analog filters need to be disabled?
They're pretty close. I've seen 44 to 46 kHz quoted. Leif Asbrink gets 90+
kHz total. Some cards might have narrower filters in front, but the
majority don't.
> How wide of a hole surrounding 48kHz will this scheme have?
Most sound cards go down to about 10 or 20 Hz, so you would have a 20 to 40
Hz hole. You might be able to remove the DC block, but it isn't worth the
effort.
> Can the sampling clock for a sound card be derived externally?
On some of them. Why do you need that?
> Your scheme gives me another idea to use the sound card: use
> a pair of track/hold devices to sample the raw analog
> voltages, one at a time, at 192kHz and offer these
> alternating time points to the two channels of the sound card
> at 96kHz, generating the timing externally as I already have
> as a requirement.
I don't see the point of this, and I doubt it would perform better.
Matt
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Parallel Port Interface,
Ettus, Matt <=