[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Dfey-general-discuss] Think Tank
From: |
Robert Leverington |
Subject: |
[Dfey-general-discuss] Think Tank |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:58:10 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi Everyone,
I have been invited to speak at a Naace think tank regarding parental
engagement using IT on Tuesday [1], and give a students perspective.
Tim and I have compiled the following ideas, but it would be great if
you have any further ideas or comments on these existing ones.
Parental engagement:
- Unless there are major concerns parents only tend to be informed of their
child's progress on at most a termly basis. Means there is little support
at home.
- More frequent reporting (daily?) would mean students would get more support
at home when they need it, likewise they would receive appraisal when they
do well.
* Possibility for students not to learn how to manage their time due to parents
micromanaging them
- Risk of over reacting parents, reduces the independence of students.
Creates problems in instances where students put in a lot of effort but due to
some triviality (doing wrong question!), get a low grade.
- Needs a wide range of task records to be held in any database; some students
do well at homework and coursework based assignments, but not so well at
exams (and vice versa).
Information:
- Large amounts of information held by schools on each pupil.
*the significance of this needs to be respected.
- In the best interests of students to be able to access as much as possible.
*(why not all of it?)
- Allows them to assess their own progress, especially useful for more mature
students.
- Currently information is handed out sparingly, can be frustrating.
*I've seen cut & paste feedback used when my ICT coursework was marked
electronically.
- Some teachers don't bother marking work, this would encourage them to and
give parents and students a way of assessing this.
* System must fully comply with Data Protection Act - this could potentially
cause problems if challenged in court.
* System needs to be clear about how long the data is retained for and for what
purposes.
Access:
- Experience with VLEs:
- Spent the first few months with people trying to get access.
- Very important to consider this.
- Web based application was useful, but students didn't check it very
often - needs to be integrated with e-mail (perhaps facebook too?).
* personal email - not school email.
- Must form an integral part of schooling, otherwise it will be neglected by
teachers and students.
- Training definitely required.
*teachers need to be 10x more enthusiastic about it than the students.
Game-based learning:
- Dependant on ability, more capable students might find it less engaging.
- Must be used to compliment more traditional tasks.
- Focus should be more on the learning than the game, there are many games
that are regularly used in school - but the majority do not do a lot to
enhance learning at all.
- Mustn't be used just so the teacher can have an easy lesson.
* Really lame games are sometimes almost even less enjoyable than normal
lessons.
* Teachers some times find it difficult to lead lessons like thids.
Students rights:
- Students must have access to all information that their parents do.
* without a doubt, I agree.
Regards,
Robert
[1] http://www.naace.co.uk/997
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Dfey-general-discuss] Think Tank,
Robert Leverington <=