Re: [Cvs-dev] Help CVS Project Solicitation

[Thorsten Glaser]

Conrad T. Pino dixit:

>CVS Project historically required substantial agreement before acting.

I sense a “and currently we do…?” here.

I suspect the best way forward is to, at some point in the future,
make a tally of who’s still interested in working as CVS project
member, then decide, uh, I think “governance” is the correct term,
among them.

>> But let me answer your questions.  Even if you don't like Savannah.
>
>Savannah opinions were said but nothing said so far is a proposal.

Indeed. With rsync-over-ssh access, I can work with Savannah,
although I still would certainly prefer to cut down on the number
of… channels (amount of mailing lists, and whatever the website
(which I’d have to recheck before making a statement on) currently
provides) to communicate/check.

Especially given that CVS’ popular time is over, so those few still
interested can come to whatever we’ll have at the end.

I’ve been active in #cvs on Freenode for, uh, way over a decade now
I guess. There’s a few other people active. Just an informative side
note for now, though.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
 seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
 seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
        -- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2