[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: performance bug of `wc -m`

From: Pádraig Brady
Subject: Re: performance bug of `wc -m`
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 09:48:14 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

On 17/05/18 23:26, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> p.s. I'm slightly worried that the _existing_ fast path processing
> for the is_basic() set, may be too big a set for mbrtowc() avoidance
> for GB18030 for example?

Actually that existing optimization should be fine
as we're checking we're not in a shift state first.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]