>From b817f62769a3997bce5140f46bd117c48d208d78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:00:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] build: rely on gnulib to determine printf routines are
 safe

gnulib now only checks that the printf routines never crash,
which is all coreutils currrently requires, and so we revert
commit v8.23-81-gf57bfbb to let gnulib decide whether to replace
the system printf routines.
---
 configure.ac | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index cac9ab2..e608611 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ cu_have_perl=yes
 case $PERL in *"/missing "*) cu_have_perl=no;; esac
 AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_PERL], [test $cu_have_perl = yes])
 
-# Disable the checks for handling certain invalid long double values
-# since this results in always replacing the printf() implementation
-# (see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17661) and
-# od (ftoastr) doesn't use the replacement anyway.
-m4_divert_text([INIT_PREPARE], [gl_printf_safe=''])
-
 # gl_GCC_VERSION_IFELSE([major], [minor], [run-if-found], [run-if-not-found])
 # ------------------------------------------------
 # If $CPP is gcc-MAJOR.MINOR or newer, then run RUN-IF-FOUND.
-- 
2.3.4