[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: du -s excluding size from directory entries?
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: du -s excluding size from directory entries? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:40:27 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 01/24/2014 08:41 PM, Aaron Davies wrote:
> would people be interested in a patch implementing this? it's about a
> dozen lines to add (~60 line patch).
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 04/13/2013 08:22 AM, Aaron Davies wrote:
>>> is there an easy way to `du -s' a tree and ignore the size of the
>>> directories themselves?
>>>
>>> if, e.g., i have one deep directory tree with a long history of
>>> modifications, and another directory tree created from a `cp -a' of the
>>> first, their `du -sb' results are likely to be somewhat different.
>>>
>>> i can get this result with something like `find -not -type d -print0|xargs
>>> -r0 stat -c %s|paste -sd+|bc', but a simpler solution would be nice.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> find -not -type d -print0 | du -hc --files0-from=- | tail -n1
>>
>> That deals with hard links in the set too.
Does the above not suffice?
If it does it's probably better than adding extra options?
thanks,
Pádraig.