coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid problematic $(< file) shell construct


From: Pádraig Brady
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid problematic $(< file) shell construct
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 19:41:31 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 12/07/2013 07:11 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/07/2013 05:39 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On 12/07/2013 04:39 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> bash and ksh were fine with this, but dash 0.5.6 wasn't so...
>>>
>>> commit 645102c94cf8fddf1251940b2af884871befb388
>>> Author: Pádraig Brady <address@hidden>
>>> Date:   Sat Dec 7 15:36:33 2013 +0000
>>>
>>>     tests: avoid problematic $(< file) shell construct
>>>
>>>     * tests/cp/link-deref.sh: This was seen to cause an issue
>>>     with dash v0.5.6 at least, so change to a simpler expression.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/cp/link-deref.sh b/tests/cp/link-deref.sh
>>> index 91a6c5d..c12dfc8 100755
>>> --- a/tests/cp/link-deref.sh
>>> +++ b/tests/cp/link-deref.sh
>>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ for src in dirlink filelink danglink; do
>>>          "$result"   \
>>>          "$ino_dst"  \
>>>          "$typ_dst"  \
>>> -        "$(< err)"  \
>>> +        "$(cat err)"  \
>>>          > out
>>>
>>>        # What was expected?
>>>
>>
>> +1, thanks.
>>
>> I'm afraid I'll be tempted to use the $(<file) construct next time
>> again.  Do you this it's worth adding a new syntax-check?
> 
> Probably. POSIX says:
> 
> "With the $( command) form, all characters following the open parenthesis
> to the matching closing parenthesis constitute the command. Any valid shell
> script can be used for command, except a script consisting solely of 
> redirections
> which produces unspecified results."

BTW this would probably be a test non specific to coreutils,
so would be based on something like sc_prohibit_reversed_compare_failure in
gnulib#s top/maint.mk.

So I'll apply without this syntax check for now.

thanks,
Pádraig.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]