[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging (-m/--merge) slower than sorting irrespective of --parallel
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
Re: Merging (-m/--merge) slower than sorting irrespective of --parallel option |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:34:24 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
On 02/22/2013 04:55 PM, Vlad ROMASCANU wrote:
Anyone have any idea why these non-intuitive results? Why does "sort -m"
appear so slow even with --parallel=1?
Should this go to address@hidden?
You got the right list for a general query like this.
I don't know either, why you're getting this surprising result.
We'll need to look into it.
thanks!
Pádraig.