Re: 8.21.2-c53c - failure on rm/deep-2 and du/long-from-unreadable

[Pádraig Brady]

On 02/19/2013 01:06 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 01:10 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > On 02/18/2013 11:27 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
> > > So ecrypts limits NAME_MAX. Indeed, running the perl snippet with $dir
> > > set to 142 works.
> >
> > OK I'll take the simple approach and skip those tests in that case.
> > Patch attached.
>
> Hi Padraig,
>
> two places with the same check ... wouldn't it be nice to wrap it into
> a "require_name_max_" or even use "require_name_max_ 200"?

I considered it, but thought it not general enough to warrant
a separated function.  The skip is not general after all.

thanks,
Pádraig.