[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
[coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault) |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:04:25 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
My recent patch had a typo in a comment, which I fixed as follows:
>From 7e9599422e85be01dfceecf1f38ff2c2952a3f61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:02:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] tests: typo fix
* tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem: Fix typo in comment.
---
tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem b/tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem
index 8ad60ed..2955e22 100755
--- a/tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem
+++ b/tests/misc/sort-stale-thread-mem
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ test "$(nproc)" = 1 && skip_ "requires a multi-core system"
framework_failure_
# With the bug, 'sort' would fail under valgrind about half the time,
-# on some circa-2010 multicore Linux platforms. Run the test 10 times
+# on some circa-2010 multicore Linux platforms. Run the test 100 times
# so that the probability of missing the bug should be about 1 in
# 2**100 on these hosts.
for i in $(seq 100); do
--
1.7.2
- Re: [coreutils] multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), (continued)
- Re: [coreutils] multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Jim Meyering, 2010/12/09
- [coreutils] Re: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Paul Eggert, 2010/12/09
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Chen Guo, 2010/12/10
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Chen Guo, 2010/12/10
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Paul Eggert, 2010/12/11
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Jim Meyering, 2010/12/11
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Paul Eggert, 2010/12/11
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Jim Meyering, 2010/12/12
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Paul Eggert, 2010/12/12
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Jim Meyering, 2010/12/13
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault),
Paul Eggert <=
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Paul Eggert, 2010/12/16
- [coreutils] Re: bug#7597: multi-threaded sort can segfault (unrelated to the sort -u segfault), Pádraig Brady, 2010/12/16
- [coreutils] draft [PATCH] sort: explicit --parallel=N now overrides environment, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/11
- Re: [coreutils] draft [PATCH] sort: explicit --parallel=N now overrides environment, Pádraig Brady, 2010/12/11
- Re: [coreutils] draft [PATCH] sort: explicit --parallel=N now overrides environment, Jim Meyering, 2010/12/12
Re: bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/04