[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-xml] ValidationConsumer Question...
From: |
Jeff Rafter |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-xml] ValidationConsumer Question... |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 22:47:34 -0600 |
> > consumer
> > components
> > name
> > next
> > flags
I think that I should add type to this list... it is inherited from
Recognizer... by the logic you provided.
> Yes. If you think of the object as a C "struct", shallow clone is just
> a memcpy of the struct contents. It's what C++ would do by default.
Ah, that is what I figured...
> Note that "same value" for an object pointer means the pointer is
> copied ... a "deep" clone would clone the object too.
Makes sense...
> I'm not 100% satisfied with that ChildrenRecognizer state
> machine, FWIW, but it seems to pass any test I've thrown at
> it. Validation of the other types of content models is clearly
> correct, but that one's a bit hairy ... :)
It is... I have scratched my head a few times already on it... : )
As an aside, I am wondering if the limitation / wording on the limitation
for standalone can be modified with the newer version of SAX.
Cheers,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting