Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] ssql-record

[Arthur Maciel]

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Arthur,

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 05:20:17 -0200 Arthur Maciel <address@hidden> wrote:

> For the sake of syntax convenience when prototyping *simple* DB
> programs, I've written an egg to produce SSQL [1]. In *NO WAY* it is
> supposed to be an ORM to DBs.
>
> I'd love to hear comments and critics about the code [2]. Programming
> is just a hobby which I perform badly.
>
> CHICKEN maintainers, if possible, please add it to the coop [3].
>
> [1] http://wiki.call-cc.org/ssql-record
> [2]
> https://github.com/arthurmaciel/ssql-record/blob/master/ssql-record.scm
> [3]
> https://github.com/arthurmaciel/ssql-record/blob/master/ssql-record.release-info

Thanks for your egg.  Before we add it to the coop, there are a couple
of things that have to be fixed:

* https://github.com/arthurmaciel/ssql-record/get/0.1.tar.gz (referenced
  from ssql-record.release-info) gives a 404.

* salmonella catches multiple mistakes.

* Egg documentation should go to http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/ssql-record
  (note the "egg" component in the path).

To identify the problems you can use salmonella or
https://github.com/mario-goulart/test-new-egg .  The latter will also
use henrietta-cache to check if the egg code can be downloaded.

All the best.
Mario

Mario, thanks for reporting the errors. It's been a long time since I last developed an egg that I missed basic steps. Sorry!

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/arthurmaciel/ssql-record/master/ssql-record.release-info

BTW, your test-new-egg had double function: to test my egg (yay!) and to serve as an example for .meta, .setup and .release-info files.

Thanks again!

Best,

Arthur