[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:17:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
* Josh Barrett <address@hidden> [161016 21:57]:
> I really like modules. I tend to use several per project, if not one per
> file. However, when it comes time to compile an executable, I'd rather not
> have 50 random .so files cluttering up the place. I've tried using
> compilation units (which seems to be the endorsed method of compiling
> multiple files together), but I can't get them to work with modules.
Those two concepts don't contradict each other, you can use both.
Can you show us a simple example of your use case that does not work?
Kind regards,
Christian
--
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from
suffering, and may you live with ease.
- [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Josh Barrett, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable,
Christian Kellermann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Josh Barrett, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Thomas Chust, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Josh Barrett, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Evan Hanson, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, John Cowan, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Josh Barrett, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Thomas Chust, 2016/10/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable, Josh Barrett, 2016/10/16