Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses"

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> On Mar 25 2013, Peter Bex wrote:
> >Please read the manual; USE accepts these import specifiers as well, and
> 
> Sorry, I'm confused.  A moment ago I tried and it complained.
> Dunno what I did wrong.

This has been added in 4.4.0, so it should work.  Maybe you had a typo?

> >like I pointed out before, you can also use require-library followed by
> >an import (the require-library form just loads the code and makes it
> >available).
> 
> OK, so how would this be different from leaving things as they are,
> i.e. (declare (uses ..)) instead of re-quire-library?
> (Both followed by an import)
> 
> Any advantage in using require-library?

Well, if you want to make use of modules, I think this is needed.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net