Re: [Chicken-users] vector-copy! compatibility and handling + what else changed around -extend?

[John Cowan]

Peter Bex scripsit:

> I did run into this incompatibility yesterday, as well.  I think
> the SRFI-43 definition is superior, as it allows you to cleanly indicate
> copying a subsection of one vector to a subsection of another, and
> it's more intuitive for people used to srfi-13's string-copy! procedure.

SRFI-43 is also R7RS in this case.

> I think it would be nice if we could support both signatures for a while,
> deprecating the old one.  If others agree I'll make a CR for this.

Sounds like a plan.

-- 
Evolutionary psychology is the theory           John Cowan
that men are nothing but horn-dogs,             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and that women only want them for their money.  address@hidden
        --Susan McCarthy (adapted)