Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

[Felix]

From: Thomas Chust <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:51:06 +0200

> Hello,
> 
> one more improvement to the SRFI-99 implementation: I've added a
> srfi-99-variants module with syntactic sugar for the definition and
> destructuring of variant types where the base type is an empty record
> and the variants are sealed subtypes.

BTW, would it be possible that you document the extensions in the
srfi-99 wiki page? This stuff is really nice - it closes a gaping hole
in our egg library and is going to be become one of my bread-and-butter
extensions. It would be cool if chicken-doc new about it, at least
the syntactic extensions to SRFI-99.


cheers,
felix