[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results
From: |
Alex Queiroz |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:09:18 +0200 |
Hallo,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> It's not in core mostly because it would make things slower (though I'm
> not 100% convinced of that; there's type dispatching for fixnums/flonums
> already anyway) and because it is an extra-large additional pile of code.
>
Indeed, I don't buy the slowness argument either. Make fixnums be
the fast path and branch prediction will do the rest.
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/
- [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Steve Graham, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Steve Graham, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, John Cowan, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Kon Lovett, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Peter Bex, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results,
Alex Queiroz <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Steve Graham, 2011/06/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Different factorial results, Jim Ursetto, 2011/06/03